Saturday 14 April 2007

Hit, Kill, Run & Chill


Drunk driver-cum-killer Alistair Pareira’s acquittal on charges of culpable homicide (click here for story) should provide great relief to many of us who drive drunk. The news that you can run over and kill seven people and yet be let off lightly makes me want to order another double patiala peg for the road. (Salman Khan might have thrown a wild bash in celebration… his own drunken driving case in which one person died is still stuck in the trial courts, and poor Salmanbhai killed just one chap!) Obviously, some serious money exchanged hands, and the evidence was sabotaged. After all, what’s the cost of lives of migrant labourers from Karnataka and Andhra in a city like Bombay? Zilch. That’s a no-brainer, the truth that the nation’s law enforcement machinery operates on the principle of different strokes for different folks.

However, what I don’t understand is this: why don’t they make amendments in the law, and make every death caused by drunk drivers tantamount to culpable homicide, without exception? Would that not prove to be enough of a deterrent for drunken drivers? And that sort of an amendment is badly needed in a city that’s full-on with people sleeping/squatting in the city’s patli gallies… in fact, pretty much every street in the city is a patli galli today, thanks to unplanned development and monumental migration from other states into the city. It is also a fact that a whole number of people drive drunk on our roads, and accidents are inevitable.

Sadly, that amendment ain’t gonna happen in a great hurry. Not at least till some big neta’s family members get run over by a drunk Alistair Pareira. Until now, only the zero-value people have been mowed down.

Till then, let’s hit the roads, bottoms up! Cheers!

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I agree with your thoughts on strengthening the law pertaining to drunken driving. Dont quite agree with making every death due to drunken driving tantamount to culpable homicide. Let me explain....

Culpable homicide exists for a reason....and drunken driving does not fall within that reason. Its quite simple when you look at it in another simpler way....

The ONLY reason there is a hue and cry amongst people (including yourself), is because the law pertaining to drunken driving today isnt stringent enough....whilst the law pertaining to culpable homicide is!

The answer lies in increasing the strength of the law pertaining to drunken driving.....e.g. making it a minimum of 3 years in prison. Maybe more....basically, add teeth to a law that is found to be out of sync with the times.

Lets not forget that the law does provide for a punishment for drunken driving....and if we feel it isnt stong enough, we should move to amend that law....rather than try and fit the crime into something it isnt!

Once we have a stronger law, like Dubai has for that matter, we'll be ordering a double patiala lassi for the road!

Cheers!

Anonymous said...

superb point, totally agree!